Stephen, >Has Paul done fade testing on the Generations enhanced black? >How much higher is the Dmax compared to the MIS black? A test of the "Indelible" black that included the Gen K is in the Files section. The Gen k is not as lightfast as the MIS FS/VM K, but it's much darker -- about 1.82 v. 1.65 (depending on printer). Many of my tests have black inks in them, but I've never done a single test with all the best blacks and papers of choice in a single, truly comparable run of the fader. So, Robert Morrison is printing abbreviated test strips (just 100% - 75%) using a number of black inks -- and only black ink -- and on a number of the best papers. I'll stick all 12 of these combinations in the fader at once so that we can eliminate the extraneous variables that might affect comparisons of one fader run to another. So, we'll have some much more accurate and comparable results in the not-too-distant future. That said, my impression from the various tests I've run is that, on EAM, Gen K is the best choice for those who really want a deeper black than the MIS VM/FS K can make. (Note that paper choice can affect the depth of blacks substantially.) The Gen K, with it's 25% dye, will definitely fade and warm more, but if deep black is more important to you than light fastness, it is a good option to try. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
[Digital BW] Ink decisions
2002-09-05 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.