Alex: My working knowledge of the Epson driver (others please step in and help/correct me because I am beyond my detailed technical knowledge of drivers) is that it does not not see in grayscale, meaning that it does not cause the ink in the Cyan position to fire when it is sent a certain brightness/luminosity/lightness/density value. It fires when sent a CMY color of a given brightness. In grayscale mode, I suspect that the CMY information is close to equal creating various shade of gray depending on the brightness information sent to the driver. I haven't checked it out, but I suspect that the Woolf workflow would work with the gray inks in any positions (but K=K) because it treats all the gray inks essentially the same -- hence the brightness of each Woolf dot is the same until K kicks in at about 50%. BTW, the Woolf curve is not very aggressive and seems to fit my understanding of your goal of mild correction. The only way that I know of to control the individual inks in any particular position with the Epson driver is to assign colors & brightnesses to the grayscale image--this is called partitioning. Roark, Brandon, and Randall workflows (found at MIS www.inksupply.com) are examples. You may have hit on something about the sequence of ink deposition creating an additional variable. Jeff Randall --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "a_pettit_jr" <a_pettit_jr@y...> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > You have identified the problem in attempting to use Woolf's correction curves : they are just S curve contrast corrections. If the inks are misplaced, this type of workflow cannot correct the error. It would take the sophisticated RGB color corrections of Paul Roark to compensate for inks in positions 'not expected' by the Epson Driver. > ( IE, the Epson driver is going to squirt from the Black position even if I install Yellow ink and no greyscale control can correct that ) > Thus my hypothesis: if the inks are incorrectly located, a simple S curve tweak will be fully ineffective. I am hoping to get as close as Epson 'expects' the inks to be and then use some mild correction curve if needed..... > > Maybe the 2000P, being pigment based, uses drivers which deposit inks in a sequence differing from the other Epsons and thus the classic hex grey sets have not worked optimally ?? > > Best, > Alex > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "jrandall1149" <jrandall@c...> wrote: > > Alex: > > > > Isn't Woolf's workflow curve just a slight tweak up from your goal of > > printing a 8-bit grayscale image with the Epson driver with no > > correction? If you are planning to control each ink seperately, I > > think you will have to convert to 24-bits and "color" the grayscale > > image so the Epson driver knows which ink to laydown (this is called > > partitioning). The Epson driver sees in RGB (converted internally to > > CMY) not in grayscale when in the color mode. > > > > Jeff Randall > > > >
Message
Re: BW densities ?? The Rest of the MIS FS Story
2002-09-05 by jrandall1149
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.