No argument: that's the tradeoff. The highest Dmax I've ever seen with any "fine art" style paper (i.e., matte) is around 1.75. And for sure, the lustre paper is feels like plastic, not rich and satisfying like a lovely ink jet coated watercolor paper. On the other hand, once either paper is behind glass, you can't feel it, and the images on the luster paper with Dmax 2.5 have a knock-your-socks-off dynamic range, with shadow detail you have to see to believe. Richard Wolfson > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry Olson [mailto:jerryolson@...] > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 6:49 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery > > > Thanks Richard. > > ... I don't like > photo luster paper at all. I'll just stick with the MIS VM > inks and Generations enhanced black. > > Jerry
Message
RE: [Digital BW] digital b&w show in Boston gallery
2002-09-06 by Richard Wolfson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.