Hi Ross, Jerry has already responsed with some good advice, but I'll add my 2 cents...FWIW... The Canon 28-135 IS lens is a great walk-around lens - not as sharp as many others in the Canon lineup - but, the IS will benefit you greatly in handheld situations. That said, I have used this lens tripod mounted and have been very happy with the results. Remember to turn IS off when on a tripod...this lens does not currently have the next generation IS system. Overall, though, IMO it's a great lens as a starter lens for the Canon D30/D60; if you like zooms, of course. On the longer end, the Canon 70-200/2.8L IS zoom or the 70-200/4L are both fantastic lenses. The decision here comes down to whether you need/want the IS and how much weight you are willing to carry. I have the f/4 version and can assure you that it is a fine lens. My decision here was based on weight. I tend to carry my photo gear great distances from the car so, to my mind, every ounce needs to be considered. The 28-70/2.8L is also a great lens, but, again, weight becomes an issue here. Also, I have heard rumors that Canon might be announcing an IS version of this lens so I would wait, at least until after Photokina, before making any purchasing decision on this one. For primes, as others have stated you probably would be hard-pressed to beat the 50/1.4 or the 100 Macro. I have the 20/2.8 prime which, I believe, has a Photodo rating around 3.5. 4.0 is considered by many to be the cutoff point for absolutely critical work, but I have been very happy with the images produced by my 20mm. And, it is/was MUCH less expensive than the 16-35/2.8L! Of course, I'm not much of an extreme wide-angle guy, therefore did not want to invest in the wide zoom. Keep in mind that a 20mm lens on the D30/D60 is equivalent to 32mm. The 35mm length is very comfortable for me, with the 24mm (full frame) about a wide as I feel comfortable shooting...though I've seen some fantastic 20mm shots...maybe I just need to "see" better with my wider lenses. ;-) If I remember correctly, one of your posts asked about doing B&W with the D60. My opinions are based on the D30 at full file size and interpolated...the D60 might produce slightly better results... I have made many attempts at trying to get acceptable B&W prints from my D30 image files from 5x7 to 11x17. To date, I have not been able to produce a final result that meets my standards. However, to be fair, I have been a LF B&W shooter for 30+ years both in the wet darkroom and, most recently (2 years) in the light room, so maybe my standards are set too high! ;-) I have read of others getting acceptable 5x7 B&W prints from D30 files (300DPI), but have not seen one of these "acceptable prints" with my own eyes. Hope this helps in your lens purchasing decisions. Best regards, Alan -----Original Message----- From: bearlick_2000 [SMTP:rmullins@...] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 5:26 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60 Hello from a lurker on this list. I am currently printing with the old piezo inks using a 1160 and primarily EAM and Photo Rag papers. I have been unhappy with the extent of the warming of this ink over time and so am about to switch to Piezotone Selenium. All of my B&W imaging to date has been from 35mm negatives and silver print scans and I am very happy with the quality of the files and quality of the Piezo prints from my 1160, especially as to the sharpness and resolution of the images. Most of my output has come from my beloved Leica M2. For negative scanning I use the Polaroid SS35, a 2700 dpi film scanner. Last year, in order to get into digital imaging, I acquired a Nikon 990 that has been marginally satisfactory for color prints up to 8x10 but have not had the quality that I would like for larger formats or for B&W conversion. B&W is my first love. Since I have been bitten by the digital bug I decided to bite the bullet and go for one of the new 6MP prosumer cameras that have come to market lately. I put my name on a waiting list for the Canon D60 back in June and just received my camera body last week. Now to the meat of my inquiry. As I am new to the Canon family I would like some advice on what are appropriate lenses that will provide the best quality results. As much as I would like to get all Canon L lenses, I am afraid that is not a reality for my strained budget. Does anyone have any recommendations for lenses other that the L series that would provide excellent results. Jerry Olson seems to be quite happy with the sharpness of his prints from his recently acquired D60. The resolution/sharpness debate that has ensued has been interesting. The math seems to come down to the fact that the lack of resolution/ detail that can reside in a 6MP file cannot possibly match that of film. I certainly accept that and recognize that I will probably not get quite the level of detail that I may desire. For Jerry my question is- what lenses is he using on his D60 body and what would he be willing to recommend for someone that is looking for the best possible results. Anyone have any opinions on the newer Sigmas or Tokinas. I need ultra wide zoom and because of price am possibly considering the Canon EF 20-35 d3.4-4.5 or if ok, the faster Sigma AF 2.8 20-4- Ex DG DF. I also would like a 28-70 where I am considering a used Canon EF 28-70 2.8 L or ? . Finally I would like to get the Canon 100-400 f4- 5.6 L IS. Any other suggestions would be appreciated. I hope that my lense questions are not too far off topic for this list. It is because of Jerry's pleasure with the sharpness of his D60 output that prompts me to bend the list topic a bit here. Every time Jerry talks about how happy he is with the sharpness/detail of his up to 13x19 output from his D60 I am asking myself what lenses he might be using. If anyone is offended by my inquiry let me extend my apologys in advance. In conclusion, I just want to say that this list is the most fabulous one that I subscribe to. I get the digest version and look forward to receiving them each day. You guys are all awesome! Ross Mullins Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by A. Huntley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.