Does anyone have the definitive answer on whether the technology in the 2200 is the same as the 7600? A post on dpreview.com states that the 2200 is less sophisticated and lays down the ink droplets in a different way. The person claims that the 2200 needs more magenta ink to render a B+W print, and this results in greater metamerism with the 2200. He claims the Gray Balancer does a great job in producing neutral grays under a specific light source but cannot totally eliminate metamerism. I was reading a British magazine review of the 2200 vs. the Canon 9000. It gave a slight edge to the 2200. Of interest was the great review it gave to Gray Balancer for B+W prints. Helene
Message
2200 vs. 7600
2002-09-10 by grdglass@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.