One more thing. This means some of those old papers, which failed on the blacks, might have new life. Todd > Here I go, answering myself, as usual. Okay, after I wrote the stuff below I > happened two print two grayscales which overlapped, and sure enough, max > black was denser where the two overlapped. So I tried it on an image that > has some large black expanses - the one I used for the first piezo exchange > in fact. Yes, rather noticeable difference. > > Ya hearin' me Jerry? BLACKER BLACKS! Perfect registration on my 1160 with > the paper guide set just snug. > > It's all in the right mask. Where you allow the overprint to cut off, and > curtail spill-over into unwanted areas. I happen to like masks, but for > those who don't, but like good blacks, this might be reason enough to pull > that PS book off the shelf for review. ;-) > > Todd > > >> Well, I got the feeling if the print were being back-lit the extra density >> would have made a difference, but once enough is put down to be opaque over >> the paper, the only way at that point to increase depth would be to add >> gloss, to change it's reflectivity. What was happening in my case was that >> the more tones of "black" I included in my image, the more they blocked up, >> and detail was lost, yet just hitting the true blacks with a second pass was >> too minimal to matter. >> >> >>> Todd, I've also noticed that SOME times you can indeed get a perfect >>> registration. I couldn't hardly believe it. It sure is odd you didn't >>> get any denser blacks with a second pass. Guess the ink was really black, >>> no? >>> >>> J >> >>> >>> Todd Flashner wrote: >>> >>>> Regarding multiple passes of the same sheet on a press, I did try running a >>>> print through my 1160 twice to try to lay down a denser black. First I ran >>>> the print through as normal, then I made a mask which allowed for printing >>>> only of the lower values of the print. I wanted to leave the mid tones and >>>> highlights alone on the 2nd pass, but double up the blacks. Good news and >>>> bad. Good: perfect registration (if anyone is going to try this I recommend >>>> you do immediately successive passes on the same printer, so that the paper >>>> guide and everything is exactly as it was on the first pass. Bad: no >>>> visible >>>> density difference. Now if I did two passes over the entirety of the print >>>> it'd double the density, and the whole print would be (was) a stop darker, >>>> but by just doubling up the blacks *I* did not see the benefit. >>>> >>>> Oh well... >>>> >>>> Now, if you could/can get exact registration on two printers you could do >>>> some very interesting toning effects by printing colors over quads, for >>>> instance. Not that any one should want to, but it does make for some >>>> interesting possibilities. >>>> >>>> Todd
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Nicholas Hartmann's Mono/multiple passes
2001-09-04 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.