If you print with color inks, sooner or later one of those inks will begin to fade. You will then get a color cast in your print. And don't believe what you read about longevity, these inks can and do fade very fast in certain locations, and heat/light/humidity conditions.... The 2000P printer inks displayed very noticeable fading in 6 months in a west window in a photographic studio in Mayville North Dakota. And they were supposed to last a hundred years with no noticeable fading. J heliar333 wrote: > > Paul - > > If I follow, there are 3 considerations: tonal integrity, longevity, > and price. No doubt, dye inks are a poor solution with respect to > longevity and price. If, however, we were to use a color inkset with > excellent longevity and value, then the question boils down to tonal > integrity. > > Perhaps I can re-state the question: Given pigmented inkset of > comparable economy and longevity, what is the compelling reason to > favor quadtone printing done with 4 or more inks, versus > the "virtual" or "simulated" quadtone available through Photoshop ? > > Thanks ! > > - Ken Lee > > > A perfectly-profiled 1280 with Epson dye ink can make B&W prints > that look > > very good -- in some light and for a little while. However, even > if you get > > the cross-overs/color tints out of the system when the print is > fresh, with > > differential fade of the dyes there will be color shifts. Also, > the photo > > will suffer from "metamerism" -- tone shifts as the display life is > changed. > > > > Probably most of us have gone through the drill of trying to use > color inks > > for B&W. The 2200 might make the grade, but until I have seen the > results > > of long-term fade tests (which I, among others, are doing) I'm > going to > > remain a bit skeptical that Epson has entirely solved the problem. > > > > Actually, a big factor you might want to consider is cost. At > least with > > the MIS ink, the cost is very low compared to Epson inks -- > especially if > > you buy bulk ink and either load carts yourself or use a continuous > inking > > system. > > > > So, a spare printer with quads might make experimenting with > digital photos > > both more satisfying and less expensive. > > > > Paul > > http://www.PaulRoark.com > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] PS Quadtones vs. a dedicated system
2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.