Ken,
I use the third-party pigments from MIS or MediaStreet. Bought in bulk,
these are very cheap and, for my uses, very good. I tried to do B&W with
the Gen3 pigs (relatively weak yellow in Gen3 has been upgraded in Gen4),
and found the tone shifts unacceptable.
I now have a fade test going with Epson 2200 and PiezoTone-selenium test
strips in the fader. The third spot in the fader is a test strip printed
with MIS archival pigments, but with the new, tougher yellow (same as the
Gen4 yellow, I believe) and the MIS FS/VM black (the best I've found). So,
the best of the 3rd party pigments are up against the new UltraChrome inks
(best combination of color and stability yet) and PiezoTone-selenium quad
(best quad midtone).
One thing I want to see is if these color inksets still have unacceptable
color shifts due to differential fade.
It is way to early to draw any conclusions -- only 100 hours now. At this
point, both the UltraChrome and PiezoTone 50% patches show a 0.01 tone
shift, but that could be less, since that is the smallest amount the X-Rite
densitometer can read. The MIS Arc pigs show a 0.03 drop in magenta. While
it's too early to make any conclusions, this is a bad sign. It may be
shifting green.
So, stay tuned. The fade test will reach 300 hours at the end of next week.
That is typically where the old warm-shifting quads started to stabilize
into a predictable, linear fade pattern. So, it may be a place where we'll
have a much better basis for some judgments about tone stability.
Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com
____________________________________________
-----Original Message-----
From: heliar333 [mailto:heliar@...]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:18 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] PS Quadtones vs. a dedicated system
Paul -
If I follow, there are 3 considerations: tonal integrity, longevity,
and price. No doubt, dye inks are a poor solution with respect to
longevity and price. If, however, we were to use a color inkset with
excellent longevity and value, then the question boils down to tonal
integrity.
Perhaps I can re-state the question: Given pigmented inkset of
comparable economy and longevity, what is the compelling reason to
favor quadtone printing done with 4 or more inks, versus
the "virtual" or "simulated" quadtone available through Photoshop ?
Thanks !
- Ken Lee
> A perfectly-profiled 1280 with Epson dye ink can make B&W prints
that look
> very good -- in some light and for a little while. However, even
if you get
> the cross-overs/color tints out of the system when the print is
fresh, with
> differential fade of the dyes there will be color shifts. Also,
the photo
> will suffer from "metamerism" -- tone shifts as the display life is
changed.
>
> Probably most of us have gone through the drill of trying to use
color inks
> for B&W. The 2200 might make the grade, but until I have seen the
results
> of long-term fade tests (which I, among others, are doing) I'm
going to
> remain a bit skeptical that Epson has entirely solved the problem.
>
> Actually, a big factor you might want to consider is cost. At
least with
> the MIS ink, the cost is very low compared to Epson inks --
especially if
> you buy bulk ink and either load carts yourself or use a continuous
inking
> system.
>
> So, a spare printer with quads might make experimenting with
digital photos
> both more satisfying and less expensive.
>
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
"flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
RE: [Digital BW] PS Quadtones vs. a dedicated system
2002-09-12 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.