I accept your take on it. I understand it as something some people like others don't. I just get irked when I hear comments making a photograph less than "something" because Photoshop was involved one way or the other. I can't understand any kind of censorship on an art form. If you are reporting reality that's another story but certainly not the case here. I've been intrigued by David's work for a while. I first saw his work not too long ago (a couple of months) and found interesting that all of the sudden it showed up here. It looks as if coming from a Hasseblad Xpan and Kodak Techpan but it could be any number of different systems. I've done a few "panoramas" like that using a simple Fuji GX680III and cropping. I would use a 617 but it's not easy to get those negatives scanned. g -----Original Message----- From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@...] Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 4:22 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints Gus, It's as relevant as someone wants to make it. What's relevant to you or irrelevant to you may be very important or completely unimportant to someone else. It's someone's own business what's important/not important to them. Why I asked, is because the small images looked very un-natural to me, so I wondered if they had been manipulated. The larger images are much more natural looking to me. I know that I'm not a fan of very unnatural looking images, whether they are massively manipulated images or not. That's my personal taste, and certainly doesn't have to be anyone else's. Austin > No, they are not "mega-photoshoped". They are just good photographs. It > has almost the same look and feel of Michael Kena's night photography. > Come to think of it, what if they were manipulated with Photoshop? Would > that make it any less? Why is that question even relevant? Have you ever > heard someone saying "mega-darkroomed"? It makes as little sense to me > as your question. > > g > > -----Original Message----- > From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@...] > Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 3:39 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints > > Steve, > > Don't they look mega-photoshoped to you? > > Austin > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sdmey4@... [mailto:sdmey4@...] > > Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 5:59 PM > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints > > > > > > http://www.afterimagegallery.com/osbornnew.htm > > Ink getting you down? Check these out... > > Steve M. Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-16 by Gus J Grubba
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.