Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints

2002-09-16 by Gus J Grubba

I accept your take on it. I understand it as something some people like
others don't. I just get irked when I hear comments making a photograph
less than "something" because Photoshop was involved one way or the
other. I can't understand any kind of censorship on an art form. If you
are reporting reality that's another story but certainly not the case
here.

I've been intrigued by David's work for a while. I first saw his work
not too long ago (a couple of months) and found interesting that all of
the sudden it showed up here.
 
It looks as if coming from a Hasseblad Xpan and Kodak Techpan but it
could be any number of different systems. I've done a few "panoramas"
like that using a simple Fuji GX680III and cropping. I would use a 617
but it's not easy to get those negatives scanned.

g
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@...] 
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 4:22 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints

Gus,

It's as relevant as someone wants to make it.  What's relevant to you or
irrelevant to you may be very important or completely unimportant to
someone
else.  It's someone's own business what's important/not important to
them.

Why I asked, is because the small images looked very un-natural to me,
so I
wondered if they had been manipulated.  The larger images are much more
natural looking to me.  I know that I'm not a fan of very unnatural
looking
images, whether they are massively manipulated images or not.  That's my
personal taste, and certainly doesn't have to be anyone else's.

Austin

> No, they are not "mega-photoshoped". They are just good photographs.
It
> has almost the same look and feel of Michael Kena's night photography.
> Come to think of it, what if they were manipulated with Photoshop?
Would
> that make it any less? Why is that question even relevant? Have you
ever
> heard someone saying "mega-darkroomed"? It makes as little sense to me
> as your question.
>
> g
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@...]
> Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 3:39 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
>
> Steve,
>
> Don't they look mega-photoshoped to you?
>
> Austin
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sdmey4@... [mailto:sdmey4@...]
> > Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 5:59 PM
> > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
> >
> >
> > http://www.afterimagegallery.com/osbornnew.htm
> > Ink getting you down? Check these out...
> > Steve M.



Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this
same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
"flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage. 


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.