--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "thronxx" > <jeffrey.fass@v...> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I have a new Epson 1280, checks out fine. I want to set it up for > > B/W, but have heard that both MIS and Cone are having problems with > > the 1280 carts. I don't need the problem, especially if it's > > avoidable. > > > > Generally speaking, and referring specifically to my 1280, will a > > CIS perform better than a cart? I was under the impression that a > > CIS system is a bottle and tube running to what is functionally a > > cart at the printhead anyway. > > > > Any suggestions would be appreciated. I'd like to keep my hair- > > pulling (whatever's left) to a minimum. > > > > Jeffrey, > > I have always found the CIS to be more trouble free than the > cartridges, if for no other reason than the fact that most problems > occur when cartridges are installed and this is a one time job for > the CIS. I'd agree on this point. I used self-filled carts on my 1280 for seven months. Occasionally (like every third time I installed them) I would get air trapped in the head and the nozzles would take about three cleanings and one or two purge patterns to clear. I could usually get them running in ten minutes or so, it was a mild problem. A little worse was when, also because of the air, a new cart would sputter ink blobs for a short period into the printer bed. I could avoid this by running two or three cleaning cycles first, but not always was I left with a clean printer even doing this. You are correct in that the CIS is nothing more than > cartridges attached with tubing to bottles of ink. As the print head > pulls ink out of the cartridge fresh ink is pulled from the bottles. > Perhaps since the cartridges are always full there are less > headaches. I have run a MIS CFS for 1 1/2 months now with little problems. It is as reliable as carts, except for the install problem noted above with carts. Something I am worrying about with the CFS that the carts do NOT have is possible evaporation of the K and to a much less degree, the C ink in the bottles. My only evidence for this is I observe deposits of ink caked onto the upper sides of the k bottle, a little in the c bottle. I do not know if this over time will increase/decrease/remain unchanged the performance of the ink thru the head and onto the paper. The deposits in bottle seem to increase over time. I have heard others talk of evaporation in the bottle, and also from the tubing. I'm sorry I can give no more resolution on this observation. I don't even know if it's a real problem yet. Jim H. People have reported some problems when they let their > bottle run too low but I have not encountered this. > > Martin Wesley
Message
Re: CIS more reliable than carts in general?
2002-09-17 by jim hayes
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.