> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@...> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:18 AM > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints > > > > > > Hi Martin, > > > > > Personally I don't care how little or how much a print has been > > > manipulated > > > before or after the shutter clicked or in the dark or in the > > > computer. If it > > > is a good print and I like it, how it got that way is not > > > important. (Unless > > > I want to know how to do it myself!<G>) > > > > Agreed, but is it photography or graphics art? > > Austin, > > I don't know that I care too much about that either and you start to get > lost in the definitions. I could reasonably say that photography is one of > many graphic art forms but I know what you are taking about. A photographer > I know started out hand tinting and has involved the full blown use of oils > to the point that none of the silver emulsion shows through on some of the > pieces. Is it painting? Is it photography? Perhaps it is both and an art > critic would call it "mixed media" Personally I don't think that it is > necessary to assign a piece of work to a category. > > Martin >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Very cool B&W Lightjet prints
2002-09-17 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.