> That's not necessarily true. It depends on the function. Reading a file > has nothing to do with the CPU, so what faster means is dubious in your > statement. My original post referred to a CPU intensive function, and we've been discussing different CPU's. Who's talking about file load times? > Or, are you going by the Intel advertising, claiming that you > need a dual 2.4G computer to browse the internet "faster" ;-) Yes. I'm totally brainwashed by Intel's advertising. I'm even going to order one of their bunny suits.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 4x5 Neg Scan Resolution
2002-09-21 by Moreno Polloni