Mark, I am glad to hear you did pursue this! I do remember you mentioning you were thinking about trying it. That is a very nice print and look! I wish I could see it person. This may be the best approach, to emphasize the coating as part of the work rather than unsuccessfully trying to make it invisible as I was doing. I guess the overall lack of enthusiasm for the people who saw the prints lead me to think no one was interested. Thanks, Martin Wesley http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Tucker" <mtucker508@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 5:26 AM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Coating, was Photogravure > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" > <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > > Jim, > > I sent around a traveling collection of coated prints and no one > was > > inspired by the look to take up varnishing. > > > Untrue, young man. > > I might not go as far as saying that your package alone inspired > me to coat, but your posts, and Robert's, and others tweaked my > curiosity to experiment. As of now, I'm glazing every "serious" > print that I make for display. > > Here's my procedure: > > 1. Make print on Museo or PhotoRag. > 2. Leave highlights just a tad open and light. > 3. First coat is with LeFranc Ageing Varnish. In the bottle, it's the > color of 10W40, and about that thick. It tints the highlights > somewhat yellow, and punches up the black in the Museo. > 4. Let that dry one day. > 5. Final coat is with Oleopasto, applied with either sheetrock > knife or foam brush, and then finish-brushed with regular brush. > It's very thick, like petroleum jelly, and dries a semigloss, and > leaves body and texture of the brush strokes. > 6. Let that dry one day. > > http://marktucker.com/temp/5481.JPG > > I have been wrapping the prints around a wood frame, almost > like a canvas painting, but honestly, that's getting old, even now. > Adds lots of time that won't be rewarded come sale time. > > I think my new thing will be to coat just the image area, so that it > shows a semigloss look, against the matte look of the > surrounding paper. Much less post-production. I'm just not sure > how I'll frame it, because I don't want glass in front of it. > > One big thing that this whole mess does -- it takes the > "computer-ness" out of the print to a large degree. The prints feel > more hand-done and organic. > > I'm sure that what I'm doing is not OSHA/Archival-approved, but > hey, I like the look and I hate every water-based product that I've > tried. They all leave that "plastic-y" look; oil is the only way for me. > > Just my opinion. > > MT, http://www.marktucker.com/ > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Coating, was Photogravure
2002-09-21 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.