Last spring Nicholson Baker published *Libraries and the Assault on Paper*, in which he raises Cain over the destruction of newspapers and other printed ephemera at the hands of librarians and others entrusted with their care. He had made his case first with an article in the *New Yorker*, and the two items made for quite a scandal. Any of the editorial reviews carried on the Amazon site will give you a sense of his argument. At any rate, one of the few bright spots in his catalog of horrors was the discovery that newspapers, even the oldest of those printed on pulp, had stabilized to a astonishing degree. The professionals, assured for years that this was an impossibility, were clearing their shelves of the originals, which Baker found were in fact bearing up far better than the microfilm and microfiche alleged to have rescued the data from the inevitable corruption to which cheap paper supposedly doomed it. Anyway, it makes for a good, if hair-raising story, well-worth a read.The point of course is that, to paraphrase Mr.Dooley, acid content is a hideous monster. On the other hand, not so fast. Apparently in the nick of time, Baker founded an institute dedicated to the rescue of runs of old newspapers (one of the reviewers gives its name, as I remember) A phone call might just put your mind at ease when you next sigh over the elegant surface and fine whiteness of that damned sour EAM. Bob Bollini
Message
Acids and paper: another view
2002-09-23 by p5198
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.