Thanks for the reply. I should have indictated that I have a 1270 that I will convert to the process.... --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > Chip, > > Depending on which printer you're using, either the FS-N or the VM inksets > are probably good choices. If you have an 1160 or 3000, you can use the > FS-N with the Epson driver. At $150 the Piezo driver is not a bad deal. If > you want to try a lot of different papers, the profiles help you do this. > > Good luck. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com > > > ___________________ > -----Original Message----- > From: photo_bear_nova [mailto:jlenkiewicz@c...] > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 4:39 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y... > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] PS Quadtones vs. a dedicated system (Attn: P. > Roark) > > > From what I see in your fade tests is that for someone making the > move to the digital darkroom the MIS FS-N seems to have the better > stability. I am wanting a set of inks that will provide for "salable" > prints. I know nothing will replace a wet darkroom print at this > point in terms of image stability. But I would like something close. > In the wet darkroom I am used to using Polycontrast Fine Art and > Polycontrast RC. > > Though since I am testing things out at this point I am hesitant in > making the $150 investment in the PZ drivers (I may decide that the > wet darkroom is the best way go after the tests). Based on your > experience with the info provided will the MIS-VM do what I am > looking for? Your curves for this ink seem interesting (as well as > your images on the website). The best of all worlds. > > Thanks for helping the beginner... > > Chip > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" > <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > > Ken, > > > > I use the third-party pigments from MIS or MediaStreet. Bought in > bulk, > > these are very cheap and, for my uses, very good. I tried to do > B&W with > > the Gen3 pigs (relatively weak yellow in Gen3 has been upgraded in > Gen4), > > and found the tone shifts unacceptable. > > > > I now have a fade test going with Epson 2200 and PiezoTone- selenium > test > > strips in the fader. The third spot in the fader is a test strip > printed > > with MIS archival pigments, but with the new, tougher yellow (same > as the > > Gen4 yellow, I believe) and the MIS FS/VM black (the best I've > found). So, > > the best of the 3rd party pigments are up against the new > UltraChrome inks > > (best combination of color and stability yet) and PiezoTone- > selenium quad > > (best quad midtone). > > > > One thing I want to see is if these color inksets still have > unacceptable > > color shifts due to differential fade. > > > > It is way to early to draw any conclusions -- only 100 hours now. > At this > > point, both the UltraChrome and PiezoTone 50% patches show a 0.01 > tone > > shift, but that could be less, since that is the smallest amount > the X-Rite > > densitometer can read. The MIS Arc pigs show a 0.03 drop in > magenta. While > > it's too early to make any conclusions, this is a bad sign. It may > be > > shifting green. > > > > So, stay tuned. The fade test will reach 300 hours at the end of > next week. > > That is typically where the old warm-shifting quads started to > stabilize > > into a predictable, linear fade pattern. So, it may be a place > where we'll > > have a much better basis for some judgments about tone stability. > > > > Paul > > http://www.PaulRoark.com > > > > ____________________________________________ > > -----Original Message----- > > From: heliar333 [mailto:heliar@a...] > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:18 AM > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y... > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] PS Quadtones vs. a dedicated system > > > > > > Paul - > > > > If I follow, there are 3 considerations: tonal integrity, > longevity, > > and price. No doubt, dye inks are a poor solution with respect to > > longevity and price. If, however, we were to use a color inkset > with > > excellent longevity and value, then the question boils down to > tonal > > integrity. > > > > Perhaps I can re-state the question: Given pigmented inkset of > > comparable economy and longevity, what is the compelling reason to > > favor quadtone printing done with 4 or more inks, versus > > the "virtual" or "simulated" quadtone available through > Photoshop ? > > > > Thanks ! > > > > - Ken Lee > > > > > > > > > A perfectly-profiled 1280 with Epson dye ink can make B&W prints > > that look > > > very good -- in some light and for a little while. However, > even > > if you get > > > the cross-overs/color tints out of the system when the print is > > fresh, with > > > differential fade of the dyes there will be color shifts. Also, > > the photo > > > will suffer from "metamerism" -- tone shifts as the display > life is > > changed. > > > > > > Probably most of us have gone through the drill of trying to use > > color inks > > > for B&W. The 2200 might make the grade, but until I have seen > the > > results > > > of long-term fade tests (which I, among others, are doing) I'm > > going to > > > remain a bit skeptical that Epson has entirely solved the > problem. > > > > > > Actually, a big factor you might want to consider is cost. At > > least with > > > the MIS ink, the cost is very low compared to Epson inks -- > > especially if > > > you buy bulk ink and either load carts yourself or use a > continuous > > inking > > > system. > > > > > > So, a spare printer with quads might make experimenting with > > digital photos > > > both more satisfying and less expensive. > > > > > > Paul > > > http://www.PaulRoark.com > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > ADVERTISEMENT > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, > Polls and > > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to > > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > this same > > page. > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - Include your full name with your message. > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier > messages to keep > > them short. > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject > header. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > > &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the > various > > resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service. > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ADVERTISEMENT > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] PS Quadtones vs. a dedicated system(Attn: P. Roark)
2002-09-25 by photo_bear_nova
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.