Digital BW, The Print

Craig,

On the inks used, I have assumed all, except the yellow.  It is 
definitely not using just the two blacks; no way the prints would 
look this good if that was the case.  The way the tint picker works, 
you can subtlely vary the colour from warm to cool etc.  That 
involves all the inks, save yellow.

The 4 and 8 pass at 1440 are different ImagePrint quality settings, 
reflecting the number of print head passes.  You could set 2880, but 
I doubt there would be any point on matte media.  Basically, 8 pass 
is about half the speed of 4 pass, as you would expect, but you do 
see the benefits in a smoother print, particularly with colour.

Quentin

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Craig J. Sterling" 
<craig@c...> wrote:
> Quentin,
> 
> Excellently written evaluation...thanks.
> 
> One thing I am not particularly clear on, and that is...when 
printing
> neutral B/W from the 7600 with ImagePrint, is the printer laying 
down 7
> colors or 2 colors?  I am told 2 colors.  If that is so, than no 
way are 2
> colors of black going to out perform the smoothness and contrast of 
6
> colors/shades of black, i.e. Quad/Hex.
> 
> Also, what is 4 pass vs. 8 pass printing at 1440?
> 
> Thanks...Craig Sterling
> 
> > From: "qdfb" <qdb@b...>
> > Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...
> > Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 22:37:12 -0000
> > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...
> > Subject: [Digital BW] Piezo Pro, 7000 and ImagePrint 5, 7600 for 
B&W.
> > 
> > Antonis suggested I post my updated views on comparisons I have
> > undertaken recently of B&W output from an Epson 7000 run by
> > Piezography Pro (the so called R9 software), with Selenium Tone 
inks,
> > and an Epson 7600, matte black ink, run by ImagePrint 5.  Finally,
> > I'll comment briefly on the 7000 / Selenium run by ImagePrint 5.
> > 
> > I deliberately use the word "views", not "findings" because this 
is
> > not a scientific experiment.  It is, inevitably, in large part
> > subjective. Your mileage, as they say, may vary.
> > 
> > If Antonis thinks it useful, I may add the images I used for this
> > test to the files section of the list so you can see what I am
> > talking about below.
> > 
> > One image, the church image, has a lot of information in the 95-
99%
> > range, but hardly any at 100%.  It is a good test of shadow 
detail.
> > The other image, from  the Olympic stadium in Barcelona, is sharp 
but
> > a bit grainy, with some deep shadows and blown out highlights.  
Both
> > are 360 dpi.  Prints were made on Photo Rag 308gsm
> > 
> > Chruch Print - Piezo
> > 
> > I have some issues with Piezo / Selenium inks.  There is some 
subtle
> > microbanding I cannot shift.  Others have reported this on the two
> > piezo lists, and it seems to be a problem associated with the 
change
> > from the old "Sundance" inks to the new PiezoTone inks.  This has
> > been a driver behind my personal search for a viable alternative.
> > 
> > I continue to be amazed at how well Piezo seperates tones in the 
95-
> > 100% region.  I'd argue it looks almost too open.  There seems to
> > have been some contrast loss with the new inks, but they exhibit
> > incredible tonality.  There is no sootiness, and you can see in to
> > the shadows. 
> > 
> > There are no visible dots under an 8x loup, but if you *really* 
look
> > closely, you can just see the "tartan" weave pattern.  Frankly, 
this
> > is irrelevant, as the surface texture of Photo Rag is more 
obvious at
> > this magnification.  If only the microbanding would shift, this 
would
> > be one near perfect print.
> > 
> > Chruch Print - ImagePrint / 7600
> > 
> > The original shot was taken on a Bronica GS 1 6x7 camera, Agfa APX
> > 25, developed in Rodinal,
> > 
> > I used a profile kindly supplied by John Pannozzo this week
> > specifically for Photo Rag and Matte ink.  Print made at 1440, 8-
pass.
> > 
> > The first point to make is that we are looking at a totally 
neutral
> > B&W print.  There are no croosover effects - no way to tell this 
was
> > not made with a quadtone inkset.  Metamerism is also almost
> > bansihed.  This, I am told, is because ImagePrint does not use the
> > yellow ink.  Whatever, it works :-)
> > 
> > It is immediately noticeable that there is more contrast in this
> > print.  It also looks slightly sharper, possibly a result of the
> > greater contrast, but I wonder also if the way ink is laid down 
is a
> > factor, or whether the smaller dot size / resolution improvement 
with
> > the 7600 is in evidence.
> > 
> > There are no dots visible to the naked eye. Under an 8x loup, you 
can
> > just make out the individual colour dyes laid down by the 7600 in
> > lighter tone areas.  Not the slightest chance you'd see this 
without
> > a powerful loup - the print looks totally dotless - and even with 
a
> > loup, the dots are far from obvious.  They are a little more 
obvious
> > under the loup if you chose 4 instead of 8 pass at 1440.
> > 
> > The shadows are well seperated with ImagePrint, but not quite as 
much
> > shadow info is visible at around the 96-98% mark as with Piezo.  
it
> > is a matter of taste which is "better".  I do think, however, 
that it
> > is more obvious where the matte black in kicks in.  I might
> > experiment with ink limiting as I think this would improve 
matters.
> > 
> > Nij Rheam and I have speculated whether the ImagePrint Gamma 2.2
> > prints just a tad too dark.
> > 
> > Stadium Print - Piezo
> > 
> > A more contrasty subject, shot on a Mamiya 7II with Agfa 100 and
> > developed in Rodinal for a high acutance negative.  Piezo seems to
> > have smoother the film grain somehow.  Print looks good: similar
> > comments to the Church image.
> > 
> > Stadium Print - ImagePrint
> > 
> > I used the tint picker with this, set at 1,1 to max out on the 
blue.
> > However, because it prints slightly warm on Photo Rag, the print 
is
> > just pleasingly slightly cool.
> > 
> > Imageprint faithfully renders the grain.  I'm not sure if Piezo 
has
> > some smoothing trick built in to the software, but something odd 
is
> > going on here.  I slightly prefer the ImagePrint print, even 
though
> > the Piezo print has fractionally more shadow detail.  The extra 
punch
> > from the Imageprint print, coupled with the tint, works for me.
> > 
> > The Piezo black is, though, a tad more dense than the Ultrachrome
> > matte.  I tried a print with a Piezo ink profile through 
ImagePrint
> > (using a special ImagePrint profile for the 7000) to the 7000 and 
the
> > extra density of the Piezo Black is repeated, so it has nothing 
to do
> > with the driver used.  The print done with ImagePrint through 
Piezo
> > looks very similar (but with the denser black) to the ImagePrint
> > print through the 7600.  It may not be quite as good.
> > 
> > Is there a winner?  Let me put it like this.  On the evidence of 
the
> > prints I have so far done, ImagePrint 5 is a viable, very high
> > quality alternative to Piezo Pro, with the benifit of the tint
> > picker, support in new profiles from ColorByte, and no banding
> > problems.  Personally, I really like the tint picker.  It imparts 
a
> > quite subtle tone to the image.
> > 
> > When it works, Piezo Pro is superb, and may just have the edge in
> > ultimate quality, in my view, but you are limited to the tone of 
the
> > inkset you have chosen, and at the moment its future is unclear.
> > 
> > One final comment: ImagePrint prints better B&W thought the 7600, 
in
> > my view, than through the 7000.
> > 
> > So - no winner, just choices.
> > 
> > Quentin
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, 
Polls and other
> > resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> > 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > 
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
wish to
> > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
this same
> > page.
> > 
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - Include your full name with your message.
> > - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
messages to keep
> > them short.
> > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
header.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> > &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> > - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
various
> > resources on the homepage.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >