Tom, The warmer paper is more than just Atlex.com as a supplier issue. I was allowed to crack open a box at our local CompUSA store. Same Lot Number, same warm paper. This is just terrible. Community at large: Is there any way to nip this in the bud? A few boxes of poor 8.5 x 11 I can live with - if it spills over to the 13 x 19 paper............Not good! Perhaps mass e-mails and calls to Epson customer service? Shilesh --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Tom O'Connell" <TomOC@s...> wrote: > Sounds like all the yellow batch we know of is the one from Atlex. I > have a couple of boxes due to arrive Monday or Tuesday from > Inkjetgoodies... I will crack one open and see if it has the same > problem and let you know. > > Tom O'Connell > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Jerry Olson > <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > > Paul, this is really distressing news, and you are the second > person to > > say this. I certainly don't want a yellower paper than the old > EAM. And > > if it has weaker blacks, what good is it? I can't afford Photo rag > to > > use as my normal paper. And there doesn't look like any > alternatives... > > Now what do we do? > > > > The absolute blackest blacks I can get are those of the Generations > or > > MIS archival inks, using the Enhanced blacks on the old EAM paper. > But > > you have to have a good profile for the ink/printer/paper to make a > > black and white print without crossovers. > > > > If you ever test any papers that give really great blacks, please > keep > > the list informed. > > > > I don't want to varnish any papers, that effect looks terrible to > me. > > > > Jerry > > > > > > > > Paul Roark wrote: > > > > > > I recently took delivery on some new EAM from Atlex.com, and it > seems to be > > > a slightly different coating than previous batches. The paper > looks a bit > > > yellow, in fact, the X-Rite says it is just 0.01 density units > darker. The > > > blacks are weak -- 1.61 v. 1.68 for the last batch -- and the > profile is > > > different. I tweaked my 3000 curves to adjust to the new > coating, but I'm > > > not happy with this batch of EAM. (It is still called "Archival" > matte.) > > > The Dmax is about the same as Legion Photo Matte, and the paper > looks yellow > > > and dull in comparison. > > > > > > Has anyone who has noticed this difference contacted Epson about > it? > > > Frankly, I want the old coating. This new batch of paper I > received just is > > > not as good. > > > > > > I also took delivery of a MediaStreet.com package of their Royal > Renaissance > > > (189), which they claim is PhotoRag. It is packaged > incorrectly. The side > > > marked "Print this side" is the back of the paper. Use > the "tongue" or > > > "lips" test. The sticky side is the coated side. > > > > > > I had not used Royal Renaissance of PhotoRag 189 before. I find > it is very > > > sensitive to the pizza wheels of the 3000 -- the most affected > paper I've > > > used. Have others noticed the problem of surface blemished > caused by the > > > printer's wheels? > > > > > > Paul > > > http://www.PaulRoark.com > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, > Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page > is at: > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by > visiting this same page. > > > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > > - Include your full name with your message. > > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier > messages to keep them short. > > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject > header. > > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the > various resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] New EAM & MediaStreet Royal Renaissance (PhotoRag)
2002-09-29 by Shilesh Jani
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.