Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Is anyone REALLY thrilled? Honestly?

2002-09-30 by Austin Franklin

Hi,

> Is anyone out there SO happy with their digital b&w production that
> will PLEASE ease my fears that I've dived into a technology that
> really hasn't gotten there yet?  Help me!!!  Is it possible to find
> b&w satisfaction in the digital world?  Can real b&w be achieved?

If you scan film, yes, satisfaction is absolutely guaranteed ;-)

The problem I've had with digital image input is the sensors used in these
digicams, are only RGB, with the exception of a few, one from Kodak and a
back from Kodak come to mind...and if it's RGB, Foveon aside, it's a Bayer
pattern imaging sensor, which means there are only %50 of the sensor
elements are green, %25 blue and %25 red.  So, what you get when you think
you've got a 6M PIXEL camera is really a 6M PIXEL camera that then
interpolates the 6M SENSOR data to give you 6M PIXELS.  That means the data
you get from the camera is made from %33 less information...so the camera is
"making up" %66 of the data you get!

I do have a digital camera that is B&W and not RGB...and it is quite good.
The problem with this is they aren't readily available, and aren't cheap.
It's a niche market, so they're going to be expensive.

I am ecstatic with my methodology, shooting MF (Hasselblad), scanning it at
2540 on a Leafscan that uses only a single ND filter, not RGB, and printing
using Piezography on an Epson 3000 on EHWM.

Austin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.