Thanks Shilesh. I've heard a lot of people print with the Somerset Velvet, but I haven't had any particularly good results with that paper. The EAM prints great, but I'm a bit concerned with the acid content of the paper and the fact that people are noticing a change from the bright white to a more yellow tone. I also really like the Photo Rag papers, but they are so expensive that I'd really like a cheaper option. Which papers do you like for good detail, smooth tones, deep blacks and for it's archival properties? Andy --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Shilesh Jani" < shilesh.jani@s...> wrote: > Andy, > > It was my post you probably saw. Just to clarify, I use EAM and a > number of art papers with the FS-N on a 1280. Each paper requires a > bit of tweaking, which I do as an curve layer for each paper. My > attempt with Somerset Velvet (Enhanced) were not very good. I did not > work very hard to optimize. But I noticed really washed out tones, so > I stopped there. It is interesting that Somerset paper does not get > discussed very much in this forum. > > Hope this helps. > > Shilesh > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "akivisuals" > <akivisuals@y...> wrote: > > I read on a post that MIS FS-N doesn't do well on Somerset > > Velvet. Does that go for the Somerset Photo Enhanced as well? > > I have printed a bit on the Somerset and it looked a bit blotchy in > > sections. Is that what the person was referring to? I like that I > > don't see any corduroy banding on the Somerset as I do on EAM, > > but I do really like the detail, bright white and smooth tones of > the > > EAM. Are there any other good options to try out? Thanks! > > > > Andy
Message
Re: MIS FS-N on Somerset Velvet
2002-09-30 by akivisuals
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.