> response", that's another one of those things like "sharpness". A two pixel > cameras is sharper than any photograph you can get! But, that's > meaningless. The new X3 chip has 3 color layers just like film does. The rest have holes in the data. I can't make it any clearer than this. I have been shooting full color capture and selling prints that look indistinguishable from film. I sold my Hasselblads when I got the Foveon because the results were just as good in my market. Now it's available for a song. No one would buy a 2 pixel camera. As far as sharpness for the others, if the MTF of the lens matches the well site pitch of the chip at the critical aperture, you have a greater potential moire condition, at some sympathetic frequency in the subject since the blue and red color "grids" are 1/4 of the total well sites. 3/4 of the data is simply not there. That's why monochip cameras have to pixel smear with AA filters or demoirize the file after the fact. I could never get the Foveon to moire exept under extreme conditions. It simply made the most "filmlike" color image I ever had. None of the other cameras could match it. Try a Sigma when it comes out. It will tell you more than I ever could. Claude
Message
[Digital BW] Re: OT: The Foveon talk I mentioned at the San Fran. get tog...
2002-10-10 by Claude
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.