Hey Don A while back, I used a fair amount of Arches Hot Press paper, which comes in a number of sizes in watercolor blocks, or in deckeled edge sheets. It is not as white as the Somerset papers. I was using these papers with a 1270 + OEM dyes. The results were very good. A collegue has of my photos framed on her wall, and it is 2 years old, and rock solid in the fade department. I have read someplace that Arches Bright White (?) is also a very good performer. The Arches Hot Press, I can vouch for as an excellent choice for OEM dyes. I might be going back to it for occasional black-ink only printing Good luck. Shilesh --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Don Eby <don_eby@y...> wrote: > --- Paul Roark <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > > Don, > > > > (Second attempt to send -- first one crashed.) > > > > What inkset and printer were you using that > > gave the blotchiness with > > Stonehenge? I have seen that effect with Museo > > on my 3000, but it does seem > > to vary with the ink and printer. > > > > Paul > > > Paul, > > I have used it with 2 inks and several printers, > and to my dismay, all had similar results. I have > used it with the 7000 and 300 with OEM inks, 1160 > and 980 with MIS FS inks. I originally used > Stonehenge on the recommendation of Jerry Nevins, > who at the time used it for his gallery work. > After using it almost exclusively for several > months, we spent some time re-evaluating it > because of the blotchiness. It would seem that > this thick paper soaks the ink up unevenly, when > a lot of ink is laid down. Because of this, I > started to try other uncoated rag papers. I had > used a Somerset Velvet before, and did not notice > this same problem. I was looking for a smooth > paper as well, so I did a side by side comparason > of several papers. I printed a stepwedge on > Somerset Velvet, Somerset Textured (a rougher > version), Somerset Satin (smooth like > Stonehenge), Stonehenge, and Rives BFK. > Unfortunately, Somerset Satin was blotchy like > the Stonehenge was. (As was Somerset Textured.) > It was about a year ago, but I think the Rives > performed the best (with respect to this issue). > Since then, I have gone back to EAM for right > now, as I am also looking for a smooth uncoated > paper. > > BTW, was the Museo that you were using with the > 3000 an uncoated paper? > > Don > > ===== > http://www.DonEby.com > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > http://faith.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Smooth uncoated paper?
2002-10-17 by Shilesh Jani
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.