Jim, You wrote: >... With a CFS and MIS VM ink in an 1280. >In the first 4-6 weeks of usage I did not notice these problems, nor >did I have them when using individual non tubing carts for 6 months >prior to CFS install. Now at 10 weeks things seem to be happening but >I would like others to verify. And my test samples are only 20 hours >dry yet, so drawing conclusions is premature: >1) 7-10 fold increase in frequency of cleaning cycles needed to get a >good nozzle check every 12 hours. Given your location and experience, I'm surprised you use a continuous feed system at all. I no longer do. They clearly have more places where there could be trouble. >2) Visible ink caking inside K bottle and a little in C bottle. The K has the highest ink load and uses a more volatile solvent. If you have used the standard MIS Archival K (not as black), does it have fewer problems? The C has the next highest loading. >3)..."leopard spots" ... Within a few minutes to an hour, >all but the 100%k, possibly 95%k steps look nearly normal- spots fade away. ... Sounds like drying I've seen on other papers. I don't know why it changes. Perhaps humidity? Perhaps the more volatile carriers have evaporated through the tubing, leaving a carrier with a different characteristic? >...mottling at 100%k is more pronounced on both fresh samples, More solvent would mean more evaporation and more change of characteristics. ??? I wonder if the UltraChrome black would work for you there. I think Epson has done the most to get the inks to behave themselves in lots of different environments. I hear that the UC-K is not that great on Eclipse, and, of course, it is more expensive. Good luck. Paul
Message
[Digital BW] mottling & lower Dmax using CFS(CIS?) over time? need input
2002-10-18 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.