>Hi Antonis, > >Just to thank you for your imput... its appreciated. I'm impressed >in your faith of your list members, I hope they "jump in" soon to. > >McGillicuddy - I'm using the flavor of MIS VM inks called "Sepia-Neutral" or just "Sepia" on an 1160, but without necessarily expecting or even wanting the prints to resemble the (usually RGB) scan on my monitor, whether I profile it (with ProveIt! software both w/ and w/o the SequelChroma4 colorimeter) or use profiles canned by Apple or Sony. In the case of a B&W original, the screen-print resemblance is sometimes nevertheless a pretty good one at _some_ stage(s) of the work flow. But whether it is or not, with a few proofs (on Epson Archival Matte), I can get a pretty faithful copy, when that's what I want, of anything from a neutral B&W original to a faded B&W to an honest-to-God sepia print. That's what I usually do for old photos I'm trying to re-print. But I typically see a good likeness of that pretty-faithful copy on the screen only in a few stages of the work flow and almost never at the end. (Only when I don't apply one of the neutral-to-sepia curves as called for at the end of the work flow.) In the case of a color original, there is of course hardly ever any screen-print resemblance at all except for neutral prints, near the end but before a curve is applied. Some screen-print difference and therefore some proofing seems to me inevitable. So I haven't bothered with soft proofing yet. Maybe I should. But in my limited experience, it often takes only a few sheets of EAM to get to something worth keeping. And I sometimes learn something along the way. McCandless, Sam (nearly a newbie) samcc@...
Message
Re: [Digital BW] newbie reply
2002-10-20 by Sam A. McCandless
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.