--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > Jim, > > >> The VM K has the highest ink load and uses a more volatile solvent. > >>If you have used the standard MIS Archival K (not as black), <snip> thanks I will print out your response and tuck it away as I consider getting some of the archival k. I already ordered a full replacement VM hex set, and I first want to see if I can fill a CART and get the mottling to go away, so I can get closure on this experiment. If it doesn't go away, it's either not the ink, or the printhead is gummed up with the altered past ink. > > UC-K appears to be tougher than the MIS VM-K. Excellent. I should follow the 2200 threads more closely than I have been... > > > and finding a workflow that doesn't cost > >$500 if possible<g>. Any illumination on these? > > I'm thinking of pulling UC-K from a 9600 cart. I think the price would be > close to PiezoTone pricing. Actually I was speaking of the IP 5 software for $500. But my gawd, is the UC ink for 2200 more expensive than PT? Well, if the printer is more behaved that's worth $$<shrug>... > > Have you tried the PT midtones? I'm curious how the carrier they use would > react in your environment. Of course, you'd be stuck with one tone, but > that is a question of your subjective preferences. The PT midtones with the > UC-K probably makes the most lightfast desktop inkset possible with today's > technology. Add a coat of UV absorbing coating, and you'd be close to a 200 > year inkset. I don't know. Sounds like a dream team, but...I just want to get back to a simple solution that works without endless tweakings, clogs, cart fillings, printhead failures, density changes (yes I know PT is not the old piezo ink), mottling, non Epson cart chips blowing out, newly installed carts bleeding ink into printer bed, having to run ink every 12 hours, controlling humidity and temperature and monitoring them closely everyday, having to run control test prints every month to be sure nothing is changing in printer or ink, throwing away expensive ink after only 3 months of usage because it's gone bad, throwing away CFS/CIS for the same reason, or even any HINT that something new may have a suspected problem flowing through a head. Maybe I should move to a wetter climate.<sorry for the rant> Arrgh! I think a 2200 next year is a certainty, even tho $$$... > >I got TSS photo to print out some stuff on Eclipse 190gsm with both > >matte AND photo black. Yes it has some problems the biggest is I'm > >disturbed by the drop out from just higher than 90%k to 100%k. > > Was this the full UC inkset in a 2200? Yes, and they were changing out their photo k for matte k on the day they did my job, so for free they printed out my files on the alternate k ink too, both on Eclipse. > > >Also of course they didn't use any correcting software and there is > >metamerism, and also an overall color change in different light. > > The full inkset is still a color inkset, and not the greatest for B&W. I'm > more inclined to use the UC-K (matte) as part of a quad set. My "matte k ink" sample shows shadow compression and well, it's rather greenish in daylight. Of course, IP5 can fix this, if I choose one light source to always view it under. Jim H. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] mottling & lower Dmax using CFS(CIS?) over time? need input
2002-10-20 by jim hayes
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.