--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "B. Alex Pettit Jr." <a_pettit_jr@y...> wrote: > I have been using sets of user filled carts with MIS FSe for about a 2 months with very little printing- but with never a cleaning cycle required. A head test yesterday was perfect. > I live in Florida ; I keep the printer covered (to keep the cat out !). > > I am wondering if a good vinyl cover over the printer might stabilize the humidity and minimize some of the printing problems being experienced by others ??? Could then get one of the temp/humid units from Radio Shack and keep the humidity at some level (70%) via a damp sponge in a small plastic bottle, etc.... > > Best, > Alex Actually, this has been recommended by people at various times in the past, you almost got their procedure exact. Most get an oversize cover and put a dish or bowl of water under it. I disagreed with the approach and never tried it because I couldn't get around a few issues: 1) the smaller the volume humidified, the harder it is to stabilize. If I wanted to target 38-45%RH for example, it is easier to do in a large room then in a display case because variations would be absorbed by the larger air mass (just my own personal reasoning, a musuem curator may have a better handle on this). 2) Any hygrometer placed under the tent would be more likely to be innacurate (not made to measure in a small space). 3) Condensation on the printer is more of an issue which could prematurely upset the electronics (again my opinion, I don't know how one would go about proving or disproving this without risking printer). 4) When the cover is removed for printing, there would be a large change in environment suddenly. However, I have to temper this statement with the rule of thumb we used when I tested products for HP....generally in an average room you have to allow 24 hours for any internal humidity level INSide a product (and the hygrometer) to stabilize. We had chambers we would test products in and we waited 1 1/2 hours for temperature stabilzation but 24 hours for RH stabilization when torture testing. A small space (suddenly removed, i.e. cover whisked off) I guess would equalize to the surrounding room more quickly, but I don't know at what rate. Yet people do use this method so it must have some validity. I don't think I'd take it as high as 70%RH. 40-50%RH seems quite adequate for my printer and Jon Cone hinted that high levels of humidity were also detrimental to printing. Alex, you are another carefree printer! So two people with low humidity in or near Colorado have nil problems and a high humidity person has no problems also. I am beginning to suspect that there is more variation printer to printer within the same model than I realized. Mine may just be more sensitive to environment. Or maybe it's just my perception, exagerating the problem as I am rather gunshy of toasting another printhead and tend to be conservative in my babying my 1280.. Jim H. Jim H.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Environment, was Clogged head
2002-10-23 by jim hayes
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.