Digital BW, The Print

> > Yet, having said all that, it's still a FINE magazine. One of the
> very
> > best on the stands. But it just makes you wonder what's
> > motivating this fear-based policy of resisting digital technology.
> > Can't we all just get along?
> >
> > Just my opinion,
> >
> > Mark Tucker, http://marktucker.com/


really? I think it's generally pretty blah, with the same old same old rocks
water trees or some old, slightly unknown photographer from the 40's or 50's
they are trying to promote so maybe he/she will become collectable, the rest
of it is stuck in the N. American fine art aesthetic, somewhere at the
beginning of the 20th century. Some so so nudes. Or the obligatory article
on someone who uses passe total lack of depth of field and loads of blurry
backgrounds. All set to fill a thousand calendar pages.

Not much to get excited about.

I find about once in every two or three editions there is an interst9ing
article - Horace Bristol in this one.


tim