At 10:23 AM 11/18/02 +0100, you wrote: >Mark, I'm playing around with the idea of dyes precisely because I want a >good black. There are only two worth looking at IMO - the Lincoln's >(www.lincolninks.com) and the Ilford Archiva. Now these, with the right >paper, are both tested to 25 years by Wilhelm. It's enough for me. As you >said before, it is the image that counts. Printing using a small gamut or >poor blacks because fading will set in 10 years or so later is crazy IMO. >Just think how much nonphotographic art out there wouldn't happen if those >criteria applied . > >Julian > I'm using the original Cone quad-black inks on photo rag and my blacks could not be darker. I'm matting them with black mats and the blacks in the prints are as black as the matts. I don't see how there could be a better black. Tina Tina Manley, ASMP http://www.tinamanley.com images available from: http://www.pdiphotos.com http://www.mira.com http://www.agpix.com http://www.newscom.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Printing for Editions?
2002-11-18 by Tina Manley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.