I happened to be doing virtually the same experiment with my 2200 this weekend, using 30 or so different watercolor/matte papers I harvested out of three different sampler packs. I printed the same image on them all, using Carl Schofield's suggested settings (I'm pre-profile, just like you) and hung them up in my livingroom to compare them. In fact, my main point was to be able to pick a paper to profile that I knew I would stick with, and I didn't think I could do that unless I knew what I was missing. What an education! I got almost identical results on EAM and PhotoRag, and those were the two best of the set (Legion Photo Matte was good, too.) I got very slight color cast differences between EAM and Photorag which I attributed to my lack of profiling, but it was nothing terribly disturbing, both were quite neutral. However, EAM did edge out the PhotoRag in deep blacks, though maybe with a profile that wouldn't have happened. I haven't tried the Satine. david --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "chipcarterdc" <chipcarterdc@h...> wrote: >... I recently ordered 2 sample sheets > of Photo Rag to try out -- after reading all the glowing reports on > it here and elsewhere, I though I'd give it a shot... >
Message
Re: Photo Rag -- results less than expected
2002-11-19 by David Wroblewski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.