--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "TerryR" <terryr1028@h...> wrote: > Martin, > > My hope is that through the efforts of Paul, Dan, and the many others > that I have not mentioned from this list, that these alternative inks > will gain popularity and thus increase the market to the point that > the manufacturers are willing to invest the time and money to offer > these curves. Terry, I believe that you are right on this. I think that we get so intent, it is easy to lose sight of just how small the market really is but I think there is a growing interest. > I thought of the Piezo B/W but shyed away due to the > cost, the banding problems, the tone of the inks, nozzle plugging, > etc... I started with Piezo but was never really happy with the color, strictly a matter of personal taste, and I could never quite eliminate the microscopic banding on my 1200. However I have seen Piezo prints that were flawless. > > The Piezo system is the way to go for someone looking at getting into > this, but you do pay for it, both in the cost of the inks, as well as > the software, and as Henry said (with a little modification on my > part) "Any tone you want as long as it is warm". The current "buy in" with a refurbished 1200 from Epson and CIS is about $1,000. I hate to send people off hunting for 1160's anymore. When Piezo comes out for the 1280 that will be the way to go but I bet the total cost with the printer will be $1,200 to $1,300. Even my 1280, CIS and MIS VM setup cost me $850. > > My thinking when I first came across the curves and inks that Paul > helped develop was "at this price, I wouldn't be out much if it > didn't work" - that is when I took the plunge. I am no expert, but > felt confident that I could apply some curves and print. I am now > glad that I did. My feelings are the same. Yesterday I worked out a simple adjustment curve to take my files that were adjusted to print with Piezo to apply when I want to print them with the Neutral MIS VM curve. Now I would really like to develop my knowledge and skills to be able to do my own ink/paper profiles. I think that this may be necessary given the printer-to-printer variations in the 1270-90 family you discussed elsewhere. > > Maybe at this point it would help to think of yourself as one of the > great pioneers that will help make it possible for the masses <g> > after all, you are the co list owner that has already helped get much > of this info out there! Well one of the motivations to get this list going was to get information for myself and boy has it worked! I may just be suffering from information over load at this point, which is making it difficult to settle into a workflow and start turning out prints. Martin > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., mwesley250@e... wrote: > > Terry, > > > > I am afraid you are right. It is a "we sell the materials and it is > > up to you to figure out how to use them" approach. There is nothing > > wrong with that if honestly communicated and given the size of the > > market even understandable. > > > > It sort of comes down to the old chicken or the egg. They don't > > support the software end because the market is too small and the > > market does indeed stay small. It seems like there are a lot of > > questions about how to get started in quad printing from people who > > have very little knowledge in the area and, as Mark Tucker said in > an > > earlier post, they are likely to buy something assuming there is > some > > support when there isn't. When this occurs it is bad for everyone. > > > > Hopefully as the market and interest does grow someone will take an > > interest in the software side and customize an existing profiling > > package specifically for quad inks. > > > > Thanks, > > Martin > > (snip)
Message
Re: another ink option
2001-09-10 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.