Jerry, Can you please be a bit more specific about why the CIS is better than either the CFS from MIS or the InkjetGoodies bulk feed system? Is this just a matter of personal preference, or are there empirical differences? The bulk feed system does seem to have some nice improvements, for example it comes with the acrylic holder, which is sold separately from the CIS. And the tubes don't stick out through the caps of the bottles, which I'm assuming means you're less likely to get air in them? I don't have one of these systems yet, and I'm mainly interested in finding something that a) isn't going to ruin my 1160 printer, b) is going to print as well as pre-filled carts, and c) is cost-effective (ruining my printer or some expensive paper would not be cost-effective). Overall, I'm a bit hesitant, because these systems seem like they can be a major pain when something goes wrong. On the other hand, maybe it only seems like they malfunction a lot because we tend to hear about people's difficulties here on the list. I'd be curious to know whether there's a happy silent majority out there, and what they're using. (MARTIN W: How about a poll on this?) Also, from what I could gather in terms of cost, all the systems -- CFS, CIS, are in the same ballpark: $125-150. I didn't see anything at MIS that costs $100 more than the $125 bulk feed system at InkjetGoodies, but maybe I was looking on the wrong page. Btw, I'm not a big fan of Cadillacs, personally... :-) Peter --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Jerry Olson <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > Get the CIS. more elegant design, easier to set up, the cadillac of CIS systems.
Message
Re: Which Continuous Ink System?
2002-11-21 by peter_in_seattle
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.