Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Wacom redux

2002-11-27 by Barry Kelsall

I have had two Wacoms, an ArtPad & an Intuous II, both 4x5. I can't imagine
using anything larger; in fact, if they offered a model 3-1/2 x 4 in size I
would go for that one.

As far as your general frustration using it, it took me a while to
transition from the relative moves of the mouse to the absolute coordinates
of the tablet. Now I use the tablet exclusively as my pointing device.

When you do get used to using it Tim, you will find it a fantastic tool for
photo editing.  -bk

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Timmermans" <treath@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:15 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Wacom redux


> I read the thread about the Wacom tablets and went out and bougjt the
> 6x8. So far I hate it. I can't draw to save my soul and I find I have
> much more control with my optical mouse. The pad seems too big for
> one thing. It seems to take the dimensions of my monitor screen and
> reduce it to 6x8 so that the curser goes from end to end.
>
> If I get the smaller one will it do the same at the smaller
> dimension? I think if I had a smaller area to deal with I might be
> more effective. I don't plan on doing any free drawing, just
> photographic editing and such.
>
> Does anyone think I'd be better off with the smaller unit? Has anyone
> else had this same frustration as me and decided to stick with a
> regular mouse or has anyone had the same frustration and ultimately
> got the hang of it and became efficient with it?
>
> Lousy drawers want to know. I still have another week or so to take
> it back to Fry's.
>
> Thanks, Tim
>
> http://timtimmermans.com

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.