Yes, Ernst, the site is very busy. I only got in once or twice, and only to the 9600 page; the other pages were down, or "timed out". If this is in fact true about the way that IP5 avoids yellow altogether, that's the first solid reason I have found yet to use that software. I always knew that yellow was the culprit, but I never knew to what degree. If IP5 kills yellow altogether, I might check out that software. Still, even with color, 72 years (ESFA) ain't bad at all. And with the addition of a coating to seal the inks from the atmosphere, I feel even better about this whole approach. MT --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Ernst Dinkla" <E.Dinkla@c...> wrote: > The site is very busy so it is hard to get there. I've been there once and > if I'm correct I saw no mention of future tests/results for third party > inks. Third party paper results will be published. The rest is all big > company ink systems. Does that indicate a change in policy or did I miss > something ? > > The year 2000 test results can be downloaded from the archive. > > Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Wilhelm Ultrachrome Ratings
2002-11-27 by Mark Tucker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.