Digital BW, The Print

I think you have to be using either glossy or lustre paper to get that black.

Jerry




Robert wrote:
> 
> How rich is the D-Max on a photograph printed from the Epson 2200
> supposed to be compared to a true photographic print?
> 
> I have two identical prints - one made the traditional wet-process
> way, and the other on the Epson 2200 with Enhanced
> Matt paper (with the Matt Black cartridge).
> 
> The D-max on the wet-processed paper is noticably darker and richer
> than the image printed on the Epson. And I know it has nothing to do
> with my printer settings -- I've got the blackest blacks my equipment
> can produce. The blacks on the Epson print lack punch, and have a
> slightly soft charcoal look to them
> 
> Everything I've read says that the D-max on Epson 2200s is supposed
> to be about as good as from photographs made the old fashioned way,
> but in my experience this just isn't so. Am I missing something here?
> Isn't the 2200 supposed to be very close to true photographic quality
> with the right inks and papers?
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/