I am using the VM inks in my 1160 and have to say that I get great tonality in my prints. Yes, the prints are not as sharp as a glazed fiber print, but I feel that in most cases that the control of tonality makes up for it. Sorry to say it, but you must be doing something wrong if your prints look like a "drawing"... unfortunately I don't know what it is, but I can suggest that you confirm that your monitor and printer are reasonably well calibrated (which they obviously are not). I started with stepwedges and got it close with adjustment curves and then worked with representative images and added more adjustment curves... and still it isn't perfect, but I do have a good feel for how an image will print by looking at my screen and am very happy with my results. I have gotten solarization/drawing type output when I lose a color, are you sure you are getting ink from all nozzles? mark ... > Yes I am frustrated. I have bee searching for the holy Grail ... > I also bought MIS Quadtones VM and worked with Paul Roark workflow > with Epson Archival Matte and Crane's Museo. I tell you I was never > more dissapointed in my life. Now I understand that so many > galleries don't want inkjet prints. It's not about longevity, it's > about quality. Pictures with MIS and EAM are drawings not photos. > Under my point of view they are sooooo far away from Fiber based > prints. ... > By the way...I am photojournalist. I have been developing my B&W > photo for 6 years now. And I think that a good fiber or even RC is > light years ahead of any ink print I have seen so far. That's only > my radical point of view. I guess some will support this statement > and some will think I am crazy. > > I can only tell you I am frustrated. ...
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Dissapointed With MIS VM Quadtone inks
2002-11-30 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.