Epson doesn't make it easy to keep the semantics straight, Jo. But I think the name of the older, watermarked-on-the back-paper is "Epson Archival Matte" (EAM). And that the name of the newer, not-watermarked and not called "Archival" paper is "Epson Enhanced Matte" (EEM). I have some of each and don't notice a quality difference. In smaller sizes, I think it's still easier to get EAM here in the US. And when I don't mind the "EPSON" and the arrow on the back of it, I cheerfully use it. But in A4 and 13x19, I use EEM, trying to be careful to print on the whiter side, since neither side is marked or has any texture. I don't know where to get either in Europe, but I bet Nigel (Nij) Rheam at MWORDS Limited (www.mwords.co.uk) in London does. Sam McCandless samcc@... >Hi All, > >I am a photographer from the Netherlands. >Just ordered an Epson 2100. >At Seybold S.F. I spoke to an Epson representative at the Epson >booth. He told me the Epson Archival Matte would be replaced by a >new paper: Epson Enhanced Archival Matte. The new paper would solve >problems like green casts discovered with the Archival Matte. >Does anyone know where In Europe I can buy the new Epson Archival >Matte in A3+ size? >Did anyone compare print quality on Enhanced Archival Matte versus >previous Archival Matte? >Best regards, > >Jo Brunenberg >http://www.jobrunenberg.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2100 / Enhanced Archival Matte?
2002-12-03 by Sam A. McCandless
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.