Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Convert to B&W plugins

2002-12-03 by Shire,Stanley

Austin:
That was the first thing that I did (look at the channels in the histo display)
tiny, tiny differences.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Austin Franklin 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:51 PM
  Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: Convert to B&W plugins


  Stan,

  You can just scan the B&W negative, in RGB, and bring it into PS and compare
  the three channels.  You can compare RGB using the histogram, as well as
  compare them visually by hitting <ctl> ~, 1, 2 and 3...for All Channels,
  Red, Green, Blue...  Depending on the image, you will see anywhere from
  small tonal differences, to quite noticeable tonal differences in the
  different channels.

  Regards,

  Austin


  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: Shire,Stanley [mailto:sshire@...]
  > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:21 PM
  > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
  > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Convert to B&W plugins
  >
  >
  > BW neg scans in color neg mode
  >
  > Quick on-the-fly-between-classes test results
  >
  > 35mm tmax 100 neg
  > Tmax developer
  >
  > The scans were made on an Imacon 848 and a Coolscan 1000 (I
  > figured that the greatest differences would show with these two)
  >
  > Both scanners set to scan at 8 bit, color neg mode.
  > Scan sizes were matched as closely as possible to 25mb
  >
  > 4 Markers placed in the same areas on each file. Tried to place
  > them in areas of differing densities.
  >
  > Imacon 848 scan
  > Marker    R    G    B
  > 1            22    22    22
  > 2            255    255    255
  > 3            240    234    234
  > 4            166    165    159
  >
  >
  > Nikon Coolscan 1000
  >
  > Marker    R        G        B
  > 1            5        5        4
  > 2            255    255    255
  > 3            206    199    186
  > 4            174    171    166
  >
  > Did not correct for density differences between the scans as I
  > wanted make no changes to the raw data as it came from the scanners.
  >
  >
  > Interpret this data as you will. My conclusion is that yes, there
  > are slight differences with red being higher in density than
  > green and blue being ther lowest density.
  >
  > The similar density differences between the two scans might
  > indicate a slight warm color in the film base.
  >
  > Big conclusion (YMMV): Very minimal difference between scanning
  > in RGB and GS modes.
  > Very minor tonal changes when converting with the ConvertToBW Pro
  > plugin. Not enough (if I were shooting a lot of BW film) to make
  > me go with a file that's 3x larger.
  >
  > Any thoughts appreciated.


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.