Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Why print at 2880 DPI

2002-12-05 by Alessandro Pardi

Jerry,
 
I think it could simply be because at smaller sizes the fine detail of the
image is, well, smaller, so it needs more resolution from the printer, and
the 2880 vs. 1440 can make a difference.
The bigger the print, the less important the printer quality: I think that
for each scanned image/printer there are two threshold print sizes: one
below which the printer resolution is the limiting factor, and one after
which the image resolution is the limiting factor.
 
Alessandro Pardi

-----Original Message-----
From: Ernst Dinkla [mailto:E.Dinkla@...]
Sent: giovedì 5 dicembre 2002 9:39
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Why print at 2880 DPI



----- Original Message -----
From: "Shilesh Jani" <shilesh.jani@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 6:29 AM
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Why print at 2880 DPI


> Jerry,
>
> On a similar, but not the same, note:  Using my D100 digital SLR, I
> have found the 12 x 18 prints (360 dpi, up-sized in PS in 5%
> increments) to be more convicing than the same image printed at 6 x
> 9.  This is viewing at arm-length, not nose-to-paper.  I find it
> strange, but I have not dug deeper to find out why!  I am going to
> try printing the 6 x 9 images at 2880 dpi to see if the prints
> get "better".

The drying time for the ink between each stroke of the printer is longer
when the print is larger. The chance ink will bleed gets much higher on a
6x9 print. The 2880 dpi shouldn't chance that or make it worse as (to my
surprise) the higher the dpi the more ink is used in Epsons. There's one
thing that slows down the printer more or less relative to the image size
and that is the time the head has to stop and reverse its direction between
strokes. If you place four 6x9 images next to one another and print them in
the same way you printed one 12x18 image and you still get better quality
for the last then you can throw my theory in the waste basket. There will be
detail lost on a 6x9 and viewed at arm-length but I presume you didn't mean
that.

Ernst


Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> 

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.