Shaun, I've seen that price at about half a dozen places in the current issue of Shutterbug. Some places are $1600. I had the Olympus E10, a 4.3 megapixel camera. It was phenomenal for 8x10 or smaller prints. Sharper than a scanned provia at 4000 DPI up to 8x10 inches. At 12x18 inches the quality was not acceptable for black and white landscapes. I believe the D30 was supposed to be just a hair better than the E10 due to a different type of pixel. It would really need to be a full 6 pixels to go to a 12x18 print, I believe. That would be 18 megabytes, and at the finest quality setting, and a little sharpening, I think that would work. If the new camera is at least 6 megapixels, I will probably sell off my other cameras and just use that from now on. The others are great cameras, but if I can get a REALLY sharp 12x18, I'll be satisfied. I have 8 canon lenses, so will be well equipped for the camera. On the Olympus, if you upsized the 10.7 megabyte image in photoshop to 25 megabytes, the files were still pretty good. In fact for close up pictures, it was extremely sharp, and the large prints were beautiful. But a landscape just couldn't quite make it, as there just isn't enough detail in that small area to get sharpness at infinity. At the wide angle position, there was too much distortion, also, and it didn't have interchangeable lenses, which I just gotta have, so I sold the camera and await the new Canon. Yes, if you have a nice shot, by all means lets see it in your print exchange. I sent my 34 prints to you today. The couple extra ones you can have for yourself. The print is entitled "Distant Shores". I'm attaching it now so you can see it, and put it up on your site with the others. Jerry http://www.westernechoes.com > Have you seen output from a D30 in order to make the quality > evaluation? If not I'll be happy to use a D30 shot as my offering in > the Print Exchange we're both involved with right now. I've seen about half a dozen 8x10 prints, that were certainly of the quality I want, but I don't know how good they would be at a larger size. >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] '
2001-09-11 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.