Digital BW, The Print

I don't think Stan meant NOT manipulating images necessarily means limiting
your vision, just that if you *wish* to do so and elect not to because of a
self-imposed rule against using such tools, you are limiting your vision. I
may be inferring a bit here on his behalf (as informed by my own feelings on
the matter), but that's my guess.

Cheers,
Matthew Born, who successfully turned a roll of 120 film into a very long
string of suddenly exposed land fill yesterday.


> Stan,
> 
>> Is photography not art?
> 
> Well, yes and no...  Some is, some isn't.
> 
>> Why limit your vision?
> 
> Who said anything about limiting vision?  If YOUR vision requires you to do
> heavy manipulations, then that's your vision, and that, perhaps, works well
> for you.  If mine does not require it, and I achieve my goal without it,
> then why is that a problem?
> 
> Austin