Yes I have always respected AA's work and it will technically knock your socks. While I have some of his books and even have a print hanging on my wall, they are missing something - maybe passion. Adams was a master technician - none better. He gave us some wonderful tools. I recently say a W Eugene Smith exhibit and there are many images burned in my mind from that day. The man caught the passion with his camera. The photos reach out and grab you. Not the greatest of all technicians, but good enough. It would have been interesting to see how either of these master would have approached the digital age. Truman Mark Hahn wrote: >Amen. > >...and on the flip side, I always leave an exhibition of AA's work in >total awe of his technique, but without a single image burned into my >brain. > >mark > >... > > >>Vision and >>technique - the mark of an artist. However, Dylan did it only with >>vision. Some say Cartier-Bression and Dorthea Lange did it without >>technique. With images as powerful as they captured, does a blocked >>highlight or dumped shadow detail make much difference? >> >> >... > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Ah, the digital argument...
2002-12-07 by Truman Prevatt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.