Mark, Thanks so much for the longish post on Eugene Smith's Schweitzer image... One of the images of Smith's which struck me similarly was a famous image of a Pittsburgh Steelworker with a distinct reflection in his dark-glasses http://www.icp.org/exhibitions/dream_street/press.html .. Until Smith's death and a full review of the negatives, it had always been assumed the reflection was inherent to the original image.. It wasn't.... ala Jerry Uelsmann, Smith had "inserted" the reflections... A sort of inverse use of the technique utilized in the Schweitzer image -- here he inserts a bright reflection instead.. For me, that makes the image no less amazing as a silver print, no less iconic, or inspiring... and certainly no less a photograph, nor any less "ART." Just as knowing that Michelangelo, DaVinci, Rembrandt and others used tracings or optical tools/technology to enhance or more easily produce "accurate" images.. In a strange way, those who see photography as purely and accurately representational , saying that using digital to make something more subjective and less realistic to hearken back to a day when photography was not accepted as art. It hearkens to a time when because it was primarily based in realistic representation and used technology so intimately, it was not deemed art. Today, some stand that paradigm on its head in an attack upon digital manipulation, saying that such manipulation makes something less a "photograph." IMHO, That argument is just patently ludicrous. It is the pragmatic and rationalized refuge of conservatives against technology, just as earlier reactionary artists and critics argued against the photograph as art for the aforementioned reasons... Keith "Just some guy," and founder of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo Publications), at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSONx7x_Printers/ "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together guys" [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Adams/Smith
2002-12-09 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.