Robert wrote: >Hydrocote is a polyurethane that is already polymerized!... >that's why it is called "poly". There are coatings which you >add a cross-linker to but they are not available in >water-based formula. My understanding is that the water-based, single-component polyurethanes do cross-link after application, whereas the acrylics do not. Both are (I've been told) soft "golf balls" in suspension. While the best cross-linking is with the 2-component, solvent-based polyurethanes, the single-component water-borne version is said to be about half way between the acrylics and the industrial-strength PURs. As I understand it, the importance of the cross-linking is that without it the coating is porous and cannot achieve as high hardness relative to brittleness. Many seem to recommend that a water-borne acrylic be coated with a solvent-based polymer to seal it and reduce the "tackiness" of the surface. My hope with the PUR is to get a single-step coating procedure that is tough enough to withstand some abuse. For a tough, durable coating, the aliphatic PURs are the standard, as far as I can tell. The 2-component, solvent-borne versions just seem like they'd be too much of a hassle to use. One company has said it will send a formula to me/us that will make a 2-component water-based PUR. This is the next step even for industrial PURs, in part due to the pressure on VOCs. This would probably be the strongest water-based coating possible today, but I have yet to receive the materials. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Coating (was Faux Meyer Rod - first dMax test results)
2002-12-10 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.