> >Hydrocote is a polyurethane that is already polymerized!...that's why it is >called "poly". There are coatings which you add a cross-linker to but they >are not available in water-based formula. The problem with viscosity is a >universal problem with water-based polyurethanes. They are not really >soluble in water so people add cosolvents to them. If the cosolvent (which >is more volatile than water) begins to evaporate the polymer starts to drop >out of solution. The polymer itself is much more viscous than the solution. >Personally, I don't fine polyurethanes to be a good solution for print >coating...there are just too many variables that can go wrong. Acrylics are >a much better solution and they are commonly used for artists >materials...polyurethanes...are not. > >Robert > I have been following this with interest...and even posted several times in the past month or two about the virtues of coating with acrylic varnish...I agree with Robert that acrylics are a much more elegant solution chemically. Find a good quality artist acrylic varnish and intermix the gloss and the matte together until you get the degree of gloss you want....Blow it through the same spray gun...easy clean up...as long as you don't let the thing dry....I shoot a lot of plain water through it after the job and follow it with some denatured alcohol to clear our the water...Never had a clog problem with the gun...Oh, it doesn't hurt to take an artists brush and scrub the tip lightly with some plain water during a long session so you don't get build up on the tip. Bill Agee -- bill agee studio capistrano beach, ca / laguna beach, ca http://www.redsilver.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Coating (was Faux Meyer Rod - first dMax test results)
2002-12-11 by Bill Agee
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.