Digital BW, The Print

Loris Medici wrote:

>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Editor P.O.V. Image Service [mailto:editor@...] 
>>Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:18 AM
>>To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>>Subject: Re: [Digital BW] EAM or Enhanced EAM?
>>
>>...
>>
>>It's the same paper, simply renamed and without a logo on the back.
>>
>>...
>>    
>>
>
>I have 3 packs of european size EAM (1 x A3+, 2 x A4) and all are
>without logo on the back. So, "being logoless" is not a specific
>property of the so named *new* EEM.
>
>  
>
OK, let's leave the logo out of it...

The fact remains it is STILL the same paper...

Chris Bair (InkJetArt.com) knows/says that, and the product manager for 
EPSON pro consumables in the US confirmed it at Photo Plus Expo East in 
November and, AFAIK, Jerry Olson's tests show that...

I hope that's good enough..

 From what I hear from as they say "reliable sources," after the latest 
Wilhelm test data came back, EPSON chose to change the name from 
"Archival" (especially given Euro "Blue Wool #6 or better" concerns) to 
"Enhanced" to avoid potential legal issues involved in calling a paper 
"Archival" which was not literally "archival"..
Keith

 

"Just some guy," and founder of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer 
User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo 
Publications), at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSONx7x_Printers/
 
"For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together 
guys"

 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]