Digital BW, The Print

In a message dated 12/16/2002 2:18:37 AM Central Standard Time, 
DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com writes:

> That rep was either NUTS or plain STUPID...
> 
> It's the same paper, simply renamed and without a logo on the back.
> 
> 

I am not really trying to be flippant...OK maybe a little, but there is alot 
of crap in the form of unsubstantiated claims that goes around on 
websites....why should we, the unknowing, believe you?

From a cost and marketing perspective, why would Epson go to the substantial 
cost and  risk product confustion, as evidenced here, to simply rename an 
existing product with no new benefit?

Jerry in Houston


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]