Digital BW, The Print

Krebs' point (stated in a later message) was that; EPSON renamed the
product because it was not "truely archival" - as its name implied...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: glewis4457@... [mailto:glewis4457@...] 
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:42 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: EAM or Enhanced EAM?
>
> I am not really trying to be flippant...OK maybe a little, 
> but there is alot 
> of crap in the form of unsubstantiated claims that goes around on 
> websites....why should we, the unknowing, believe you?
> 
> From a cost and marketing perspective, why would Epson go to 
> the substantial 
> cost and  risk product confustion, as evidenced here, to 
> simply rename an 
> existing product with no new benefit?
> 
> Jerry in Houston