Other than photography, I have also studied painting and print making at the Art Inst., Chicago and I was always worried about the archival properites of my works on paper. I asked a conservator about it and he told me frankly that under most situations nothing on paper would last more than one hundred years unless it gets into a museum level environment. But to make me feel better he said that if my work hadn't made it into museums within a hundred years it really didn't matter because no one would care about it anyway:) At some level, you just have to do the best you can and then stop worrying about it. mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Jerry Olson <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > Keith, out of curiosity, can anyone agree on the exact longevity of the > term "Archival" ? Is there so many years a print has to exist with no > changes at all to be called that? How about museums? When they > announce that they use "Archival Mattes" How long must they last before > they show signs of yellowing? ...
Message
archival was:Re: [Digital BW] EAM or Enhanced EAM?
2002-12-16 by Mark Hahn <markhahn2000@yahoo.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.