Tuesday, December 24, 2002, 1:40:02 PM, Jerry Olson wrote: JO> Eclipse satine bright white is whiter than photorag, has a very smooth JO> surface and a textured surface on back, both sides printable, great JO> price, 100 percent rag, acid free, etc.. JO> Jerry Jerry, I am a big fan of Photo Rag even having only used it a short time. The blacks are much richer and darker for me printing with my 1160 and MIS FS-N inks than I get from printing on EAM or Eclipse Satin Bright White 190. Also the detail and sharpness is much finer when printing on the Photo Rag. I would love to use the Eclipse Satine bright white as I like it's texture, ability to choose either side to print on, and of course, price. My results, while good, still cannot rival the great results I see with Photo Rag. How are the results with the Eclipse Satine bright white compared to Photo Rag for you, and what printer and inks are you using? Did you do any curve or otherwise other adjustments to get better results with Eclipse Satine bright white? Thanks. If anyone else would like to chip in their comments/suggestions, please feel free.... Best regards, Richard mailto:richard@... L i n k s t o m y g a l l e r i e s: http://fujirangefinder.com/document.php?id=246
Message
Eclispe Satine vs. Photo Rag. Was: Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1205
2002-12-25 by Richard Sintchak
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.