On my 1280 in some prints I can see what might be called "obvious dots". But I don't think they're actually the dots of ink from the printer. They're very small dots that are actually in the digital image itself as results of posterization in either the camera capture or more probably the jpeg compression. At least that's my conjecture at the moment. Herbert Sitz --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob_Michaels <Bob@B...>" <Bob@B...> wrote: > I'm curious about the "obvious dots". Is this at 1440 or higher dpi? > My 1280 printing with just the black ink at 1440 has dots, but you > need a lupe to see them. I know they are different printers and > different inks. I wonder if something in the 2200 causes this aspect > to take a step backward. > Bob Michaels >
Message
Re: 2200 w/ Photo Black
2002-12-26 by Herbert Sitz <hsitz@nwlink.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.