2200 w/ Photo Black
2002-12-20 by Clayton Jones <cj@cjcom.net>
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC
Thread
2002-12-20 by Clayton Jones <cj@cjcom.net>
Hello 2200 Users, Daniel reported that with his 2100 and Photo Black ink, even when choosing "black ink" the 2100 still uses all the inks. Only when using Matte Black ink will it print black only. I'm wondering if this is specific to the 2100 or is also a feature of the 2200. Can anyone verify this? Regards, - cj
2002-12-21 by lomoeye <james.stogdill@verizon.net>
I have a 2200 and when you select black only in the epson driver set up it warns you that it will not print acceptably with only the black inks selected, but it will do it. This is true with the photo black cartridge, I have not yet used the matte black ink. The warning is accurate however. The result is a tonally neutral print but with very obvious dots. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones <cj@c...>" <cj@c...> wrote: > Hello 2200 Users, > > Daniel reported that with his 2100 and Photo Black ink, even when > choosing "black ink" the 2100 still uses all the inks. Only when > using Matte Black ink will it print black only. I'm wondering if this > is specific to the 2100 or is also a feature of the 2200. Can anyone
> verify this? > > Regards, - cj
2002-12-21 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
I'm curious about the "obvious dots". Is this at 1440 or higher dpi? My 1280 printing with just the black ink at 1440 has dots, but you need a lupe to see them. I know they are different printers and different inks. I wonder if something in the 2200 causes this aspect to take a step backward. Bob Michaels --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "lomoeye <james.stogdill@v...>" <james.stogdill@v...> wrote:
> I have a 2200 and when you select black only in the epson driver set > up it warns you that it will not print acceptably with only the black > inks selected, but it will do it. This is true with the photo black > cartridge, I have not yet used the matte black ink. > > The warning is accurate however. The result is a tonally neutral > print but with very obvious dots. > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones > <cj@c...>" <cj@c...> wrote: > > Hello 2200 Users, > > > > Daniel reported that with his 2100 and Photo Black ink, even when > > choosing "black ink" the 2100 still uses all the inks. Only when > > using Matte Black ink will it print black only. I'm wondering if > this > > is specific to the 2100 or is also a feature of the 2200. Can > anyone > > verify this? > > > > Regards, - cj
2002-12-26 by Herbert Sitz <hsitz@nwlink.com>
On my 1280 in some prints I can see what might be called "obvious dots". But I don't think they're actually the dots of ink from the printer. They're very small dots that are actually in the digital image itself as results of posterization in either the camera capture or more probably the jpeg compression. At least that's my conjecture at the moment. Herbert Sitz --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob_Michaels <Bob@B...>" <Bob@B...> wrote:
> I'm curious about the "obvious dots". Is this at 1440 or higher dpi? > My 1280 printing with just the black ink at 1440 has dots, but you > need a lupe to see them. I know they are different printers and > different inks. I wonder if something in the 2200 causes this aspect > to take a step backward. > Bob Michaels >